cygwin_lock_lock strace output
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Fri Dec 10 16:19:00 GMT 2004
On Dec 10 17:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Does anybody hate the
>
> __cygwin_lock_unlock: threadcount 1. not unlocking
> __cygwin_lock_lock: threadcount 1. not locking
>
> strace messages as much as I do? Is it really necessary to print them
> all the time?
>
> To put it in other words, would it hurt people badly if we change the
> default strace mask so that the _STRACE_PARANOID flag isn't set anymore
> as in
>
> if (!mask)
> mask = _STRACE_ALL & ~_STRACE_PARANOID
Which doesn't work that way of course. But you get the idea.
Corinna
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list