committers?
Robert Collins
robert.collins@itdomain.com.au
Fri Apr 19 15:23:00 GMT 2002
Chris,
I'm confused. You have, on a fairly often basis, lamented the
fact that no-one other than you and Corinna seems to take responsibility
for reviewing cygwin patches and changes. You seem to be indicating that
you want more input into cygwin. Yet when I do just that, on a patch
that is certainly not harmful (while maybe not optimal). I didn't
realise I was overstepping boundaries when I checked it in, so I'd
appreciate it if you could restate those so I don't do so in future.
>If one of the functions is obsolete, it should be deleted. That means
>that the patch does *not* look good. It needs to be reviewed.
Fine, back it out (as you did). That's not a big deal. Just to be clear:
I'm not upset that the patch was reverted, simply confused.
Rob
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list