consistent version of Interlocked* functions
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Mon Nov 26 21:24:00 GMT 2001
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:48:14PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:47 PM, cgf wrote:
>> Are there any objections to my using these? Robert? The thread code
>> would be the most affected, of course.
>
>I'll do a little research and get back to you.
I've just built a version of cygwin which uses these, fwiw. Seems to be
fine on XP dual 733MHZ PIII.
*pause*
Sigh. I got an "illegal operation" error *once* running this on Windows
95 on A pentium processor. Otherwise, it actually seems to feel faster.
I can't duplicate the (&(*&% error, now though.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-developers
mailing list